Team ratings definitely need to be based on a different foundation. If highly skilled drivers form a new team, their personal ratings rise rapidly as well. It would be much better—fairer and more realistic—if the team rating were dynamically calculated as an average of the drivers currently in the team.
Stand right now is:
There were S2 and S3 drivers behind us who were nevertheless promoted due to their team's poor rating. That is nonsense. We—who are less skilled drivers—were positioned further up the grid, yet we actually lost rating points, despite being only S1 drivers. nonsense.
Could someone please explain this?
Why isn't the team rating simply calculated as an average of the drivers within the team?
Eventually, the team ranking should mirror the personal ranking. However, this can never happen because my team rating always lags behind my personal one. When I rank up, both my personal and team ratings rise—and vice versa. They will always remain unequal.
the evaluation is despicable. On this basis, team racing makes no fun and offers no fair rewards.
please LMU, change this to "average rating."
Stand right now is:
There were S2 and S3 drivers behind us who were nevertheless promoted due to their team's poor rating. That is nonsense. We—who are less skilled drivers—were positioned further up the grid, yet we actually lost rating points, despite being only S1 drivers. nonsense.
Could someone please explain this?
Why isn't the team rating simply calculated as an average of the drivers within the team?
Eventually, the team ranking should mirror the personal ranking. However, this can never happen because my team rating always lags behind my personal one. When I rank up, both my personal and team ratings rise—and vice versa. They will always remain unequal.
the evaluation is despicable. On this basis, team racing makes no fun and offers no fair rewards.
please LMU, change this to "average rating."