Like apples and oranges perhaps.This is a akin to complaining that Burger King don't sell Big Mac burgers, or that your local Ford dealer doesn't sell Chevrolet Corvettes.
It's very simple. If 397 doesn't find a way to sell apples and oranges, players will enjoy them wherever they can be offered (iRacing is rubbing their hands together and preparing a pocket for the money). And you can continue eating raw potatoes and defending 397 for free. Thanks to free "lawyers" like you, the studio staff won't lift their asses from their chairs.Like apples and oranges perhaps.![]()
How did you know I was a lawyer?It's very simple. If 397 doesn't find a way to sell apples and oranges, players will enjoy them wherever they can be offered (iRacing is rubbing their hands together and preparing a pocket for the money). And you can continue eating raw potatoes and defending 397 for free. Thanks to free "lawyers" like you, the studio staff won't lift their asses from their chairs.
That was exactly what i said to my friend 2 days ago! We need EVERY ENDURANCE License as a DLC Pack! And at the End as cherry on top add Nürburgring and run 3x 24h virtual events just pn LMU!I'm not sure, if its possible, but it would be absolutely great!!
We need every single possible track, because LMU is very limited on tracks.
(Of course, the cars and liveries would be nice too)
Don't forget to upvote!!
View attachment 6447
i didnt meant racing hypercars on ring…The thing is, these cars have never run at the Ring, and the racing would be shit and carnage
Currently, IMSA = ACC would be a better comparison.IMSA = iRacing![]()
When WEC signs a contract with ADAC & NLS & whomever else controls the Ring, you might get your wish. But until then.....i didnt meant racing hypercars on ring…GT3 and GTEs… i know running only that would not be „multiclass“ like when hypers and lmps are on track as well… but 62 card on the track… could be fun as well
![]()
Sadly I'm totally agree, it would not expect so much expansion in terms of licensing, overall taking in count there is still so much to fix and polish. The current WEC environment is not finished yet, SC and FYC are mandatory to fulfill an endurance event.When you have a product that is the official representative(game) of an organization(WEC) that group would probably not be interested in funding development that benefit other series. Because WEC shares the umbrella of organizations with ELMS and AsLMS, & Le Mans Cup. Those can be integrated fairly cheaply with existing contracts. But as you spread your net further away from WEC, you need more contracts, more licensing, more cross sponsorships. So hoping for any of the SRO circuits like Kyalami, Missano or even Bathurst is a pipe dream. (forget about all those ACC tracks completely)((that include Nords)) (((ESPECIALLY NORDS!!!)))
IMSA has had some agreements with WEC to allow some of the American cars to compete at Le Mans and then to codify the hypercars for equal competition. But that still falls short of the amount of agreements needed to bring the IMSA tracks to LMU. WEC would have to sign on. and probably IMSA would have to chip in some funds. Would they rather see their money go to a title that doesn't even include the term IMSA?
Finally, on the practical side of things: S397 has been struggling to release 1 track per quarter. How would they ever encompass all the IMSA circuits(something like 13 of them?)
Best case scenario would be to take the fully finished LMU code and get licensing agreements with IMSA to sell a completely different sim based soley on IMSA.
if LMU were an generic sportscar title, then sure, any track could POSSIBLY get licensed...much like AMS2 or ACE. But just as ACC was and IS limited to only circuits used by SRO series. so is LMU limited to ONLY tracks they(WEC) control. Of course IF IMSA got a sim, then we would have to repeat this thread all over again about how no World GT, or F1(outside of COTA) or BTCC tracks or V8Supercar tracks or Karting tracks, or Bobsledding tracks, or horse tracks just wouldn't be appropriate.